MétaCan
← all works

Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics

2020· book· en· 464 citations· W2952274844 on OpenAlex· 10.1093/oso/9780198801856.001.0001

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread
0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Abstract Conceptual engineering is a branch of philosophy that is concerned with assessing representational devices such as concepts and words. Conceptual engineers looks for the problems with such devices and attempt to come up with ways of improving flawed concepts: they attempt to say how those concepts should be. This is the first volume devoted entirely to the possibility, benefits, problems, and applications of conceptual engineering and conceptual ethics. It consists of twenty chapters; some advocate for the field, while others develop sceptical arguments, and some focus on the various methodological issues that arise while others apply the method to issues in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and social and political philosophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Field
Health Professions
Canadian institutions
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversität HamburgEuropean Commission
Keywords
SkepticismEpistemologyMetaphysicsConceptual frameworkField (mathematics)Focus (optics)Engineering ethicsConceptual schemaManagement scienceSociologyComputer scienceEngineeringPhilosophyMathematics
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes