Part 2: Efficient strategies for the construction of variably substituted bicyclo[5.3.1]undecenones (AB-taxane ring systems) and their conversion to tricyclo[9.3.1.0<sup>3,8</sup>]pentadecenones (ABC taxane ring systems) and bicyclo[2.2.2]octanones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extension of our strategies for the construction of cyclic molecules containing variably substituted bicyclo[5.3.1]undecenones (AB taxane ring systems) for the synthesis of the tricyclo[9.3.1.03,8]pentadecenone (ABC taxane ring system) and bicyclo[2.2.2]octanones are described. These routes employ a multi-component coupling protocol that employs sequential magnesium-mediated carbometallation of allyl-substituted propargyl alcohols followed by diastereoselective Lewis acid catalyzed intramolecular DielsAlder reactions (IMDA). Subsequent ring-closing metathesis (RCM) afforded the ABC taxane core structure. Enone accelerated [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangements (Cope rearrangements) generated the bicyclo[2.2.2]octanone nucleus. In the presence of a Lewis acid, the dienophile precursor underwent a tandem reaction via the adduct directly to the bicyclo[2.2.2]octanones. This is the first example of a novel enone accelerated carbocycle Cope rearrangement and provides direct access to bicyclo[2.2.2]octanones by a new route that compliments the traditional cyclohexadiene cycloaddition approach. Key words: magnesium chelate, Lewis acid, taxanes, DielsAlder, sigmatropic rearrangement, oxy-Cope, ring-closing metathesis, bicyclo[2.2.2]octanone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".