MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952316248 · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00975

Redox-Driven Chelation and Kinetic Separation of Select Rare Earths Using a Tripodal Nitroxide Proligand

2019· article· en· W2952316248 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bren E. Cole, Thibault Cheisson, Robert F. Higgins, Eiko Nakamaru‐Ogiso, Brian C. Manor, Patrick J. Carroll, Eric J. Schelter

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNature Conservancy of CanadaUniversity of PennsylvaniaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsChemistryChelationRare earthElectron paramagnetic resonanceRedoxInorganic chemistryMineralogyNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Separation of the rare-earth (RE) elements (Sc, Y, La–Lu) is challenging because of their similar chemical properties, but is necessary for their applications in renewable energy and electronic device technologies. The development of separation processes driven by kinetic factors represents a new area for this field. Herein, we disclose a novel method of separating select rare earths by reacting RE cyclopentadienides with the triradical species tris(2-tert-butylnitroxyl)benzylamine (1). The key proligand 1 was characterized using a variety of techniques including X-ray crystallography, magnetometry, and EPR spectroscopy. When applied to an equimolar mixture of La:Y cyclopentadienide complexes, different rates of chelation of these organometallic precursors by 1 were observed, affording a separation factor of 26 under the reported conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207