ALIDATION OF A GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF ETHANOL IN LIQUID PREPARATIONS INTENDED FOR CHILDREN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1984, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended limiting alcohol content to no more than 5% and restricting the volume of products containing alcohol to non‐lethal quantities. In 1993, a committee representing the Food and Drug Administration and the Nonprescription Drug Manufacturers Association agreed to develop voluntary limits for the alcohol content of liquid dosage preparations. The committee concluded that all over‐the‐counter products designed for children less than six years of age should be alcohol‐free. Products labeled for children 6‐12 years of age should contain no more than 5% alcohol. Products for children over 12 years and adults should be limited to 10% alcohol content. In certain products requiring higher alcohol contents to achieve solubility, warning labels would instruct parents to contact a physician prior to giving these products to children. To date, limited documentation of such interaction exists because of a lack of scientific studies on this subject. Hence attempt was made to evaluate quantity as well as quality aspects in terms of contamination from menthol, camphor and propylene glycol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".