MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952334728 · doi:10.1139/v05-212

SnCl<sub>4</sub>I<sub>2</sub> mediated regioselective 6-endo- and 5-exo-cyclization of <i>ortho</i>-allylenols

2005· article· en· W2952334728 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. C. Majumdar, Ashim Kumar Biswas, P. Mukhopadhyay

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSynthesis and Biological Activity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, IndiaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsChemistryRegioselectivitySigmatropic reactionClaisen rearrangementCarroll rearrangementAlkylationMedicinal chemistryHalideOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3-Allyl-4-hydroxycoumarins and 4-allyl-3-hydroxycoumarins are obtained in 90%–92% yields by the thermal [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement of the corresponding ethers. 3-Allyl-4-hydroxy-6-methylpyrone is obtained from the direct alkylation of 4-hydroxy-6-methylpyrone with allyl halide. These substrates on treatment with SnCl 4 –I 2 at 25 °C give a mixture of both 5-exo- and 6-endo-cyclization products. However, regioselective formation of 5-exo products is observed when the reactions are conducted at lower temperatures (0–5 °C, kinetically controlled), while the reaction at a higher temperature (50 °C, thermodynamically controlled) affords regioselectively 6-endo cyclization products.Key words: stannic chloride, iodine, claisen rearrangement, 6-endocyclization, 5-exocyclization, kinetically controlled reaction, thermodynamically controlled reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and Biological ActivityFrench-language works237,207