Les dilemmes de la Russie face aux nouvelles routes de la soie chinoises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse les enjeux internes et externes que pose, pour la Russie, le projet chinois des Nouvelles routes de la soie (nrs). Nous montrons que, compte tenu des transformations économiques enregistrées durant la période récente par les deux pays, l’intensification des échanges entre la Chine et la Russie soulève désormais de tout autres questions qu’il y a vingt-cinq ans. Nous évaluons ensuite dans quelle mesure les nrs peuvent servir de levier de développement des infrastructures de la Russie, mais aussi les risques de mise en concurrence de la Russie dans l’espace post-soviétique. Nous étudions les possibilités d’évolution des échanges sino-russes au travers notamment de leur composante énergétique et concluons sur une tentative de mesure de l’impact potentiel des nrs sur les rapports économiques entre la Russie et les pays d’Asie centrale post-soviétique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".