MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Scalable Pattern Recognition and Real Time Tracking of Moving Objects

2019· article· en· W2952371377 on OpenAlexaff
Dipak Pudasaini, Abdolreza Abhari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDynamic time warpingComputer visionNaive Bayes classifierPattern recognition (psychology)Cluster analysisTracking (education)Video trackingMean-shiftScalabilityCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionObject (grammar)Support vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposed a new approach for object tracking and pattern recognition of moving objects during real time video streaming. This approach uses motion based multi-object movement techniques for tracking the objects. Moreover, Spectral clustering with Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) and Naïve Bayes method are used for pattern recognition of tracked objects. This system tracks the moving objects collected as a batch of videos then the pattern recognition technique uses for analyzing vehicles movement to determine normal or abnormal behavior. This paper proposes the tracking algorithm for all moving objects and pattern recognition for only moving vehicles. The performance of tracking trajectories is calculated by finding recall and precision values, which are greater than 95%. The experimental result shows that Naïve Bayes is better than spectral clustering for the classification of vehicle trajectories that conforms Naïve Bayes is an effective tool to scale the pattern recognition of moving vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207