MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spin polarisation with electron Bessel beams?

2016· preprint· en· W2952505915 on OpenAlexaff
P. Schattschneider, Vincenzo Grillo, Thomas Schachinger, Stefan Löffler

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsElectronSpin (aerodynamics)Angular momentumQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the statement of Bohr and Pauli that Stern‐Gerlach based spin separation for electrons cannot work [1], it has been argued that spin separation or filtering of electrons is possible in particular geometries [2,3]. The argument has been debated, see e.g. [4], and it seems that the effect exists but is too small to be exploited with present day technology. As of now, no Stern‐Gerlach design of a spin polarizer for free electrons was successful. On the other hand, an unexpected intrinsic spin‐orbit coupling (SOC) in relativistic vortex electrons was discovered, and it was proposed to use this effect to construct a spin filter for free electrons [5]. Recently, it has been shown [6] that crossed electric and magnetic quadrupole fields correspond to so‐called q‐plates which are used in laser optics for spin‐to‐orbital moment conversion (STOC). In combination with electron vortex beams, this opens the possibility to couple the spin of free electrons to the spatial degree of freedom, and so design a spin filter [7]. However, the realisation of such devices is hampered by severe geometric constraints. Here, we propose a different approach exploiting the magnetic fields created by the lenses already present in conventional TEMs. The vector potential of a round magnetic lens in the TEM has cylindrical symmetry over the propagation axis. This is equivalent to an optical q‐plate. Such a field can be used as a STOC device quite similar to the optics case because the total angular momentum J= L + S is a constant of motion. Thus, it seems that electron microscopes are intrinsic spin polarizers. Basic considerations show that a vortex beam of order one passing a standard magnetic round lens (the objective lens in the present case) is intrinsically spin polarized. As shown in Fig. 1, the vortex in plane A can be seen as a continuous line of point sources (red dot) on the ring aperture, each of which results in a tilted plane wave in B. Classically, the momentum p of the particle in A is tilted by the Lorentz force to p’ at B (grey arrows). The spin vector (red arrows) performs a precession in the magnetic field when going from A to B. Conservation of the total angular momentum J=L+S creates small contributions of Bessel beams J 0 or J 2 , depending on the original spin polarisation in plane A, which are superimposed onto the dominant J 1 beam in plane B. This spin‐to‐orbit coupling allows spin filtering because J 0 and J 2 have different radial profiles. In the limit of infinitely small detectors on axis, the spin polarisation tends to 100 %. Increasing the detector size, the polarisation decreases rapidly, dropping below 10 −5 for standard settings of medium voltage microscopes. For extremely low voltages, the figure of merit increases by two orders of magnitude, approaching that of existing Mott detectors (Fig. 2). Our findings may lead to new desings of spin filters, an attractive option in view of its inherent combination with the electron microscope, especially at low voltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Microscopy Congress 2016: ProceedingsSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207