MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952577691

Differentially Private MIMO Filtering for Event Streams and Spatio-Temporal Monitoring

2014· preprint· en· W2952577691 on OpenAlexaff
Jérôme Le Ny, Meisam Mohammady

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOccupancyDifferential privacyReal-time computingMIMOConstruct (python library)Event (particle physics)Data stream miningBuilding automationForcing (mathematics)Data miningComputer networkEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract—Many large-scale systems such as intelligent trans-portation systems, smart grids or smart buildings collect data about the activities of their users to optimize their operations. In a typical scenario, signals originate from many sensors captur-ing events involving these users, and several statistics of interest need to be continuously published in real-time. In addition, in order to encourage user participation, privacy issues need to be taken into consideration. This paper considers the problem of providing differential privacy guarantees for such multi-input multi-output systems operating continuously. We show in particular how to construct various extensions of the zero-forcing equalization mechanism, which we previously proposed for single-input single-output systems. We also describe an application to privately monitoring and forecasting occupancy in a building equipped with a dense network of motion detection sensors, which is useful for example to control its HVAC system. I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207