MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952664795 · doi:10.1002/rsa.20305

Network delay inference from additive metrics

2010· preprint· en· W2952664795 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shankar Bhamidi, Ram Rajagopal, Sébastien Roch

Bibliographic record

VenueRandom Structures and Algorithms · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCenter for Integrated Protection Research of Engineering StructuresDivision of Emerging FrontiersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesHarvard UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsInferenceMetric (unit)MulticastComputer scienceNetwork delayNetwork topologyAlgorithmTime complexityMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Theoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer networkCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We use computational phylogenetic techniques to solve a central problem in inferential network monitoring. More precisely, we design a novel algorithm for multicast‐based delay inference, that is, the problem of reconstructing delay characteristics of a network from end‐to‐end delay measurements on network paths. Our inference algorithm is based on additive metric techniques used in phylogenetics. It runs in polynomial time and requires a sample of size only poly(log n ). We also show how to recover the topology of the routing tree. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRandom Structures and AlgorithmsSame topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207