Synthesis of Tertiary and Quaternary Stereogenic Centers: A Diastereoselective Tandem Reaction Sequence Combining Mukaiyama and Free Radical-Based Allylation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reported herein is a strategy employing a Mukaiyama reaction in tandem with a free radical-based allyl transfer reaction for the elaboration of functionalized tertiary and quaternary centers. The appropriate choice of alcohol-protecting group on the starting alpha-methyl-beta-hydroxyaldehyde and the nature of the Lewis acid used in the Mukaiyama reaction provided access to 3,4-anti and 3,4-syn aldolization products, precursors of the free-radical allylation reaction. After migration or exchange of the Lewis acid, the allyl transfer reaction with allyltributylstannane is then performed by taking advantage of the endocyclic effect, leading to the 2,3-anti relative stereochemistry. Importantly, (13)C NMR studies of the chelated intermediates are also reported and provide additional support for the endocyclic effect. In some cases, the remarkable reactivity of the aluminum-based Lewis acids allowed the use of allyltrimethylsilane, an interesting reagent from an ecological standpoint. The isolation of a key intermediate is also indicative of an atom transfer mechanism when the silicon-based reagent is employed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".