MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952704890 · doi:10.1021/bk-2004-0885.ch011

Sequential Hydrocarbon C—H Bond Activations by 16-Electron Organometallic Complexes of Molybdenum and Tungsten

2004· book-chapter· en· W2952704890 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMolybdenumTungstenHydrocarbonAlleneThermal decompositionAcetyleneGroup 2 organometallic chemistryTriple bondPhotochemistryMedicinal chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryDouble bondMoleculeCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cp*M(NO)(hydrocarbyl)2 complexes (Cp* = η5-C5Me5) of molybdenum and tungsten exhibit hydrocarbyl-dependent thermal chemistry. Thus, gentle thermolysis of appropriate Cp*M(NO)(hydrocarbyl)2 precursors (M = Mo, W) results in the loss of hydrocarbon and the transient formation of 16-electron Cp*M(NO)-containing complexes such as Cp*M-(NO)(alkylidene), Cp*M(NO)(η2-benzyne), Cp*M(NO)(η2-acetylene), and Cp*M(NO)(η2-allene). These intermediates effect single, double, or triple activation of hydrocarbon C-H bonds intermolecularly, the first step of these activations being the reverse of the transformations by which they were generated. This Chapter summarizes the various types of C-H activations that have been effected with these organometallic nitrosyl complexes to date and presents some of the results of kinetic, mechanistic, and theoretical investigations of these processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it