MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952713720 · doi:10.22158/uspa.v2n3p170

Insurance and Non-Conforming Land Use (Note 1)

2019· article· en· W2952713720 on OpenAlexaff
D. A. L. Auld, Clive Southey

Bibliographic record

VenueUrban Studies and Public Administration · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExternalityBureaucracyBusinessValue (mathematics)Public economicsEnvironmental planningEnvironmental economicsNatural resource economicsMicroeconomicsEconomicsComputer scienceGeographyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purchase of a residential home carries the risk of adjacent properties being rezoned in a manner creating negative externalities reducing the value of nearby residential homes. In most municipalities, appeals against rezoning are a costly and time consuming activity both for appellants and the public administrative bureaucracy. In this paper we establish the framework to analyze the creation of a residential insurance arrangement that has the potential to reduce the costs associated with appeals to restrict rezoning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrban Studies and Public AdministrationSame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207