MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2952793183 · doi:10.1101/678284

Neuroanatomical Changes in White and Grey Matter after Sleeve Gastrectomy

2019· preprint· en· W2952793183 on OpenAlexafffund
Andréanne Michaud, Mahsa Dadar, Mélissa Pelletier, Yashar Zeighami, Isabel García‐García, Yvonne Yau, Mélanie Nadeau, Simon Marceau, Laurent Biertho, André Tchernof, D. Louis Collins, Denis Richard, Alain Dagher

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval
KeywordsWhite matterSleeve gastrectomyMedicineWaistCorpus callosumInternal medicineCircumferenceEndocrinologyNuclear medicineBody mass indexMagnetic resonance imagingPathologyWeight lossObesityRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background MRI studies show that obese adults have reduced grey (GM) and white matter (WM) tissue density as well as altered WM integrity. It remains to be examined if bariatric surgery induces structural brain changes. The aim of this study is to characterize GM and WM density changes in a longitudinal setting, comparing pre- and post-operation and to determine whether these changes are related to inflammation and cardiometabolic markers. Methods 29 severely obese participants (age: 45.9±7.8 years) scheduled to undergo sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were recruited. High-resolution T1-weighted anatomical images were acquired 1 month prior to as well as 4 and 12 months after surgery. GM and WM densities were quantified using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Circulating lipid profile, glucose, insulin and inflammatory markers (interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) were measured at each time point. A linear mixed effect model was used to compare brain changes before and after SG, controlling for age, gender, initial BMI and diabetic status. To assess the associations between changes in adiposity, metabolism and inflammation and changes in GM or WM density, the mean GM and WM densities were extracted across all the participants using atlas, and linear mixed-effect models were used. Results As expected, weight, BMI, waist circumference and neck circumference significantly decreased after SG compared with baseline (p<0.001 for all). A widespread increase in WM density was observed after surgery, particularly in the cerebellum, brain stem, cerebellar peduncle, cingulum, corpus callosum and corona radiata (p<0.05, after FDR correction). Significant increases in GM density were observed 4 months after SG compared to baseline in several brain regions such as the bilateral occipital cortex, temporal cortex, precentral gyrus and cerebellum as well as right fusiform gyrus, right hippocampus and right insula. These GM and WM increases were more pronounced and widespread after 12 months and were significantly associated with post-operative weight loss and the improvement of metabolic alterations. Our linear mixed-effect models also showed strong associations between post-operative reductions in LBP, a marker of inflammation, and increased WM density. To confirm our results, we tested whether the peak of each significant region showed BMI-related differences in an independent dataset (Human Connectome Project). We matched a group of severely obese individuals with a group of lean individuals for age, gender and ethnicity. Severe obesity was associated with reduced WM density in the brain stem and cerebellar peduncle as well as reduced GM density in cerebellum, regions that significantly changed after surgery (p<0.01 for all clusters). Conclusions Bariatric surgery-induced weight loss and improvement in metabolic alterations is associated with widespread increases in WM and GM densities. These post-operative changes overlapped with baseline brain differences between severely obese and normal-weight individuals, which may suggest a recovery of WM and GM alterations after bariatric surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→