The Landscape of Type VI Secretion across Human Gut Microbiomes Reveals its Role in Community Composition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract While the composition of the human gut microbiome has been well defined, the forces governing its assembly are poorly understood. Recently, prominent members of this community from the order Bacteroidales were shown to possess the type VI secretion system (T6SS), which mediates contact-dependent antagonism between Gram-negative bacteria. However, the distribution of the T6SS in human gut microbiomes and its role have not yet been characterized. To address this challenge, we construct an extensive catalog of T6SS effector/immunity (E-I) genes from three genetic architectures (GA1-3) found in Bacteroidales genomes. We then use metagenomic analysis to assess the abundances of these genes across a large set of gut microbiome samples. We find that despite E–I diversity across reference strains, each individual microbiome harbors a limited set of E-I genes representing a single E–I genotype. Importantly, for GA1-2, these genotypes are not associated with a specific species, suggesting selection for compatibility. GA3, in contrast, is restricted to B. fragilis , and its low diversity reflects a single B. fragilis strain per sample. We further show that in infant microbiomes GA3 is enriched and B. fragilis strains are replaced over time, suggesting competition for dominance in developing microbiomes. Finally, we find a strong association between the presence of GA3 and increased abundance of Bacteroides, indicating that this system confers a selective advantage in vivo in Bacteroides rich ecosystems. Combined, our findings provide the first comprehensive characterization of the T6SS landscape in the human microbiome, implicating it in both intra- and inter-species interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".