Demagnetization Analysis of Interior Permanent Magnet Machines Under Integrated Charging Operation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrated battery charging (IBC)-multiplexing the motor windings as line inductors for charging electric vehicle battery packs-can improve the onboard charging capability without increasing the weight and cost. However, during the charging operation, currents flowing in the stator winding definitely generate a magnetic field, which may demagnetize the permanent magnets (PMs) in the PM traction motors. In this paper, the demagnetization effects of IBC current on magnets in interior PM machines are compressively investigated. In this paper, a recursive algorithm to update the PM magnetization states by using a parallelogram hysteresis model at different demagnetization levels is applied. The PM temperature is also considered for establishing this model. By coupling this algorithm to the finite element analysis, the demagnetization transit at different demagnetization levels can be assessed. By decomposing the flux density of each node within the magnets along its magnetization direction, irreversible demagnetization can be accurately evaluated. Impacts from both the pulsating and rotating demagnetization magnetic fields during the IBC operation are assessed and compared.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".