Compositional Effects in Ru, Pd, Pt, and Rh-Doped Mesoporous Tantalum Oxide Catalysts for Ammonia Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of early metal-promoted Ru-, Pd-, Pt-, and Rh-doped mesoporous tantalum oxide catalysts were synthesized using a variety of dopant ratios and dopant precursors, and the effects of these parameters on the catalytic activity of NH3 synthesis from H2 and N2 were explored. Previous studies on this system supported an unprecedented mechanism in which N-N cleavage occurred at the Ta sites rather than on Ru. The results of the present study showed, for all systems, that Ba is a better promoter than Cs or La and that the nitrate is a superior precursor for Ba than the isopropoxide or the hydroxide. 15N-labeling studies showed that residual nitrate functions as the major ammonia source in the first hour but that it does not account for the ammonia produced after the nitrate is completely consumed. Ru3(CO)12 proved to be a better Ru precursor than RuCl(3).3H2O, and an almost linear increase in activity with increasing Ru loading level was observed at 350 degrees C (623 K). However, at 175 degrees C (448 K), the increase in Ru had no effect on the reaction rate. Pd functioned with comparable rates to Ru, while Pt and Rh functioned far less efficiently. The surprising activities for the Pd-doped catalysts, coupled with XPS evidence for low-valent Ta in this catalyst system, support a mechanism in which cleavage of the N-N triple bond occurs on Ta rather than the precious metal because the Ea value for N-N cleavage on Pd is 2.5 times greater than that for Ru, and the 9.3 kJ mol-1 Ea value measured previously for the Ru system suggests that N-N cleavage cannot occur at the Ru surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".