MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952991242 · doi:10.3998/mij.15031809.0006.104

Complex not Complicated: Gendered Media Industries in the Wake of #MeToo

2019· article· en· W2952991242 on OpenAlex
Skadi Loist, Deb Verhoeven

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedia Industries · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWakeSociologyGender studiesMedia studiesEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the wake of #MeToo and #TimesUp, it has become clear that the problem of patriarchy in the screen and media industries is vast, scaled, unrelenting, and brutal in its impact. Our responses need to be equally nuanced, complex, and unyielding. This special section offers four essays that collectively represent our aim for a multifaceted, international, and intersectional set of perspectives. Read in combination they unpick industry binaries such as below-the-line versus above-the-line professions, pre-and post-industry, personal/individual versus political/structural, and North American versus (other) global industries. As such, this section is part of an urgent, on-going conversation about how to effect meaningful change in current media industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it