MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952998100 · doi:10.1021/ic0619254

Crystal Structure, Electronic Structure, and Physical Properties of Ti<sub>1-</sub><sub>δ</sub>Mo<sub>1+</sub><sub>δ</sub>As<sub>4</sub> and Ti<sub>1-</sub><sub>δ</sub>Mo<sub>1+</sub><sub>δ</sub>Sb<sub>4</sub>

2007· article· en· W2952998100 on OpenAlexaff
Shahab Derakhshan, Abdeljalil Assoud, Katja M. Kleinke, Holger Kleinke

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMonoclinic crystal systemCrystal structureTernary operationSeebeck coefficientCrystallographyThermoelectric effectElectrical resistivity and conductivityStructure typeMetalElectronic structureThermodynamicsComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new ternary pnictides, Ti(1-delta)Mo(1+delta)Pn4 (Pn = As, Sb), were uncovered during our search for novel thermoelectric materials. Both compounds crystallize in the OsGe2 type in the monoclinic space group C2/m, with lattice dimensions of a = 10.1222(9) A, b = 3.6080(3) A, c = 8.1884(8) A, beta = 120.230(2) degrees , and V = 258.38(7) A3 (Z = 2) for Ti(0.79(1))Mo(1.21)Sb4 and a = 9.1580(2) A, b = 3.3172(1) A, c = 7.6666(1) A, beta = 119.496(1) degrees , and V = 202.720(4) A3 (Z = 2) for Ti(0.86(2))Mo(1.14)As4. The electronic structure calculations predicted metallic behavior for these compounds, which was in agreement with the measured temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0120.012
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0080.006
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207