MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953036880 · doi:10.1002/chin.201420219

ChemInform Abstract: Phase‐Pure Crystalline Zinc Phosphide Nanoparticles: Synthetic Approaches and Characterization.

2014· article· en· W2953036880 on OpenAlexaff
Md Hosnay Mobarok, Erik J. Luber, Guy M. Bernard, Peng Li, Roderick E. Wasylishen, Jillian M. Buriak

Bibliographic record

VenueChemInform · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNanoparticleFlocculationCharacterization (materials science)PrecipitationPhase (matter)ZincPhosphideChemical engineeringNuclear chemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Phase‐pure and crystalline Zn3P2 nanoparticles (≈3—15 nm) are prepared by two different solution‐phase strategies using precipitation from a 1‐octadecene solution of P(octyl)3 (TOP) and ZnMe2 (348 °C, 2 h) followed by flocculation of nanoparticles with PrOH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemInformSame topicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207