MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953038510 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz044.p24-063-19

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Blood Concentrations of Toxic Metals (P24-063-19)

2019· article· en· W2953038510 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Zuchniak, Daniel Roth, Huma Qamar, Abdullah Al Mahmud, Anne Marie Z. Jukic

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCord bloodPlaceboMedicinePregnancyVitaminRandomized controlled trialCordPlacebo groupGestationVenous bloodInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To estimate the dose-response effect of 4200 IU/week, 16,800 IU/week and 28,000 IU/week of vitamin D3 during pregnancy (versus placebo) on maternal delivery whole blood (maternal) and venous cord blood (cord) concentrations of the toxic metals lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and manganese (Mn) in a randomized clinical trial in Bangladesh. The study included a sub-set of participants (maternal: n = 619; cord: n = 516) from the Maternal Vitamin D for Infant Growth (MDIG) randomized controlled trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Vitamin D3 or placebo was administered from 17–24 weeks gestation until delivery. Metal concentrations (maternal and cord) were quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Metal concentrations in each treatment group were compared to placebo using linear regression. Maternal Cd and Hg and all cord metals were log-transformed due to non-normal distributions, and results were expressed as % differences. Compared to placebo, cord Pb was 8.5% higher in the 4200 IU/week group (CI: −3.6%, 22%; P = 0.18), 16% higher in the 16,800 IU/week group (CI: 3.2%, 30%; P = 0.01) and 11% higher in the 28,000 IU/week group (CI: 0.36%, 23%; P = 0.04). Since 76% of cord Cd samples were below the limit of detection, we dichotomized Cd as detectable or non-detectable. The risk of having detectable Cd was 2.18-fold higher in the 4200 IU/week group (CI:1.27, 3.75; P = 0.005), 1.38-fold higher in the 16,800 IU/week group (CI: 0.76, 2.50; P = 0.29), and 1.72-fold higher in the 28,000 IU/week group (CI:1.02, 2.91; P = 0.04). Prenatal vitamin D3 did not affect maternal metal concentrations, or cord Hg or Mn concentrations. Vitamin D3 increased cord Pb and Cd concentrations without clear dose-response effects. Even at high intake levels, vitamin D3 supplementation in pregnancy was not associated with other cord metal or maternal metal concentrations. Further longitudinal studies are required to explore how vitamin D treatment increases cord metal levels, with little or transient effect on maternal levels, and to describe the trajectory of metal concentrations across gestation in response to vitamin D supplementation. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207