Dietary Intakes of Folic Acid During Pregnancy Determines Maternal Re-Set of Metabolism Post-Birth in Wistar Rat Dams (FS08-06-19)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nutrition during pregnancy alters the “re-set” of maternal metabolism and in turn the mother’s metabolic phenotype later in life. Folic acid (FA, synthetic folate) consumed at intakes above requirements during pregnancy by rats leads to increased weight gain and altered DNA methylation in central and peripheral pathways regulating food intake. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of intakes below and above FA dietary requirements on the re-set of energy metabolic pathways in Wistar rat mothers early post-birth. Pregnant Wistar rats (n = 12/group) were fed an AIN93G diet with 5 levels of FA: 0X, 1X (control, 2 mg FA/kg), 2.5X, 5X or 10X. Dams were fed 1X-FA during lactation up to 1-week post-weaning (PW) when maternal metabolism is thought to re-set to homeostasis and then terminated. Weekly body weight, food intake, expression of hypothalamic food-intake neurons, mRNA and protein expression of folate-related and energy metabolic genes, and glucoregulatory hormones were measured. The homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was used as a surrogate index of insulin resistance. Below (0X) and above (5X and 10X) FA requirements during pregnancy suppressed expression of hepatic folate metabolism (methyltetrahydrofolate (MTHF) reductase, and methionine synthase; P < 0.05) genes and led to higher 5-MTHF (P < 0.005) in blood compared to control suggesting dysregulation of 1-carbon pathways. Dams fed 0X- and 5X-FA also had higher plasma insulin and HOMA-IR than controls and changes in glucose and lipid metabolism-regulating genes in muscle (Glucose transporter-4, and Peroxisome-proliferator activated receptors; P < 0.05) but not liver or adipose at 1-week PW. The diets did not affect expression of hypothalamic food intake neurons nor body weight or food intake of the dams from birth to 1-week PW. FA below (0X) or above (5X, 10X) requirements during pregnancy induce dysregulation of 1-carbon pathways and delay re-set of energy metabolic pathways in Wistar rat dams by 4-weeks after birth, potentially programming long-term negative metabolic effects. This research was supported by: Canadian Institute of Health Research, Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes (CIHR-INMD); EP supported by NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarships-Doctoral Program (CGS D).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".