MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953046929 · doi:10.1021/ic0624524

Solid-State <sup>129</sup>Xe and <sup>131</sup>Xe NMR Study of the Perxenate Anion XeO<sub>6</sub><sup>4-</sup>

2007· article· fr· W2953046929 on OpenAlexaff
Michelle A. M. Forgeron, Roderick E. Wasylishen, Michael Gerken, Gary J. Schrobilgen

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXenonChemistryChemical shiftOctahedral symmetrySolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceNMR spectra databaseNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyHeteronuclear moleculeNuclear magnetic resonanceAtomic physicsCrystallographyIonSpectral linePhysicsPhysical chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207