MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953068911 · doi:10.1453/ter.v3i1.615

Econo- and Socio- Physics based Remarks on the Economical Growth of the World

2016· article· en· W2953068911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agata Angelika Rzoska

Bibliographic record

VenueKSP Journals - Journal of Economics Bibliography · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconophysicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Exponential functionTerm (time)Product (mathematics)EconomicsEconometricsExponential growthNeoclassical economicsPower (physics)Keynesian economicsPhysicsMathematicsHistoryMathematical analysisThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that the long term evolution of the Gross Product of the World after World War II can be well portrayed by the simply exponential function with the crossover at the year 1973, which coincides with the Oil Crisis onset. For such basic parameter as the S&P 500 index the single exponential behavior extends down to at least the mid of the nineteen century. It is notable that the detailed short-term insight focused on the last quarter of century revealed the emergence of the power like dependence, despite notable irregularities. However, such dependences can be introduced only when taking into account the behavior at reference-baselines years, clearly related to the society – important events in the past. The possible relationship to the growth/death evolution of microorganisms is also discussed. Keywords. Global product growth, Econophysics, Sociophysics, Microbiology. JEL. E20, F43, D24.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKSP Journals - Journal of Economics BibliographySame topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207