MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953136803 · doi:10.4000/pds.2497

Un patrimoine protestant méconnu : les cimetières familiaux

2017· article· fr· W2953136803 on OpenAlex
Patrick Cabanel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePatrimoines du Sud · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyArtPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’interdiction du protestantisme en France, de 1685 à 1787, et la disparition des cimetières protestants, ont contraint les « nouveaux convertis » restés secrètement fidèles à leur foi à se faire enterrer hors du cimetière catholique : dans les caves, les jardins, les prés. Les autorités ont fini par fermer les yeux (à partir d’une déclaration de 1736), dès lors que la mort était dûment signalée par écrit, et une tradition est née, qui a survécu jusqu’à nos jours, devenant un signe fort de l’identité huguenote – et des paysages protestants - dans la France contemporaine. Ces cimetières familiaux, au nombre de plusieurs milliers dans les régions rurales protestantes, très inégalement connus et conservés, commencent à être étudiés : forme de l’enclos, présence ou non d’un arbre signal, inscriptions bibliques. L’article propose une première mise au point à propos de ce patrimoine faussement familier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it