MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953144534

Fund Investment Decision in Support Vector Classification Based on Information Entropy

2019· article· en· W2953144534 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siyang Jiang, Qianju Long Xiuyan Yao, Hui Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Economics and Finance · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEntropy (arrow of time)Support vector machineInvestment (military)Artificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As to the complex investment decision with big data, how to portray the essential characteristics to answer its evolving complexity of the mechanism, and how to make risk identification, assessment and measurement have become problems which urgently need to be addressed by investors. In this paper, the support vector classification based on information entropy (IE-SVC) is put forward to improve the accuracy in the field of capital investment decisions. Two classic methods, the K-Nearest Neighbors algorithm (K-NN) and the Radius Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN), are applied to compare the performance. In the experiment of Gates foundation investment decision, its results show that the IE-SVC can be faster and higher accuracy than those of other methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Economics and FinanceSame topicStock Market Forecasting MethodsFrench-language works237,207