MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953161490 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2019.32

High-resolution Sequence Stratigraphy and Implications For Cretaceous Glacioeustasy of the Late Cretaceous Gallup System, New Mexico, U.S.A.

2019· article· en· W2953161490 on OpenAlexaff
Wen Lin, Janok P. Bhattacharya, Andrew Stockford

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousCitationPaleontologyIconGeologyLibrary scienceStratigraphySedimentary rockLithostratigraphyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Deciphering the relationships between traditional lithostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy is the key to correctly understanding time-stratigraphic relationships and basin evolution. Both insufficient sample spacing, which induces “aliasing,” and lack of datums are problematic issues for sequence stratigraphic correlation. High-resolution sequence stratigraphic analysis of the Cretaceous Gallup Formation, deposited during the late Turonian to early Coniacian, documents the high-frequency depositional cyclicity using detailed facies analysis in extensively exposed outcrops in northwestern New Mexico, USA. Seventy-one sedimentological sections were measured along the depositional-dip-oriented outcrop belt, with less than 1 km average distance between measured sections. Laterally extensive bentonite layers, deposited on nearly horizontal seabeds, provide chronological control and are used as datums for accurate correlations with minimal stratigraphic distortion. Based on the integration of key bounding surfaces with detailed facies analysis, twelve stratigraphic sequences, consisting of twenty-six parasequence sets composed of sixty-one parasequences, were identified. Four classes of shoreline trajectory are quantified: ascending regressive with accelerating and decelerating rates, descending regressive, and transgressive. The maximum shoreline transgression and regression of individual parasequence sets are up to 60 km and 48 km respectively. The maximum estimated relative sea-level fall and rise of individual parasequence sets are 34 m and 38 m. Parasequence sets show aggradational–progradational, retrogradational, progradational–aggradational, and degradational stacking patterns. These accommodation successions help to define systems tracts. The results show that the previously mapped sandstone tongues are equivalent to high-frequency sequence sets. Chronostratigraphic analysis shows that the Dilco Member is diachronous and correlated to different sequences. The Torrivio Member fluvial sandstone was probably deposited diachronously, and part of it may be Gallup age. The matching magnitudes of relative sea-level falls and rises, and an absence of evidence of tectonism, suggest a eustatic control. Autogenic processes may have operated during deposition but were not the dominant controls. The estimated depositional durations of sequence, parasequence set, and parasequence are 100 kyr, 46.2 kyr, and 19.7 kyr, respectively, implying that Milankovitch-cycle-dominated glacio-eustasy may be the key control on the high-frequency sequence stratigraphy of the Gallup system in greenhouse age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207