Controlling Chemoselectivity in Vinyl and Allylic C−X Bond Activation with Palladium Catalysis: A p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub>-Based Electronic Switch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that the same Pd catalyst can be used to effect allylic substitution or vinylic cross-coupling reactions selectively and interchangeably on polyfunctionalized olefin building blocks despite the differences in reaction mechanism. This was achieved by altering the pK(a) of the conjugate acid of the allylic leaving group while keeping the vinyl coupling partner constant. In the case of 2,3-dibromo-1-propene, Pd-catalyzed allylic ionization with malonate nucleophile proceeded selectively and quantitatively in the presence of the Suzuki reaction components necessary for cross-coupling. Conversely, the bromide of 2-bromo-1-(4-ethylphenoxy)-2-propene could be cross-coupled selectively without activation of the allylic phenoxy substituent. In both reactions, the same catalyst could then be used to complete the sequence, which typically involved heating as the trigger to promote the second, more reluctant reaction. Mechanistic considerations as well as synthetic applications demonstrating the value of this interchangeable catalyzed sequence are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".