MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953197703 · doi:10.32459/revistalumen.v3i6.95

EFEITOS E AFETOS DA RACIONALIDADE SOCIAL CONTEMPORÂNEA

2019· article· pt· W2953197703 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marco Naccarato

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Lumen - ISSN 2447-8717 · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyRationalitySociologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<span>Na tentativa de descrever efeitos e afetos que surgem no interior da racionalidade social contemporânea, o artigo parte do discurso de formatura proferido pelo escritor David Foster Wallace no Kenyon College, em 2005, para estabelecer relações entre as descrições do <em>novo capitalismo</em> de Richard Sennett, e a nova racionalidade social do neoliberalismo de Pierre Dardot e Christian Laval, que apontam diversas formas pelas quais o modo de vida dos indivíduos na sociedade é condicionado. Utilizando-se do diagnóstico desses autores, propomos uma aproximação entre os efeitos produzidos por essa racionalidade social e a dinâmica de afetos presente no sistema filosófico de Espinosa.</span>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Lumen - ISSN 2447-8717Same topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207