Kung Saan Nagtatapos o Humahantong ang Ilog Boac: Isang Pag-aaral na Komparatibo ng Postkolonyal na Ekokritisismo at Eko-Kosmopolitanismo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Binabalikan ng papel ang mga alaala ng may-akda ng kanyang kabataan at ilang pagbisita sa Marinduque upang pag-aralan ang naganap na sakunang pagtagas ng lason ng minahan sa Ilog Boac dala ng mga gawang pagmimina ng Marcopper Mining Corporation. Susuriin ng papel ang mga hangganan ng postkolonyal na ekokritisismo at eko-kosmopolitanismo upang makahanap ng angkop na balangkas teoretikal na maaaring magamit para sa isang ekokritika na lumalampas sa mga hangganang pambansa at estado, upang harapin ang mga usapin ng katarungang panlipunan at pangkalikasan nang lampas pa sa pagkakakilanlang nakabatay sa lugar tungo sa kritika ng mga hangganan. Nakapaloob ang papel sa balangkas ng pag-unawa na nagmumula sa personal na karanasang diasporiko ng may-akda, partikular sa ugnayan ng Canada at Pilipinas, na hindi naman talaga nakabatay sa kolonyal na kasaysayan ang ugnayan, kundi sa ideolohiya ng globalisasyon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".