MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953221942 · doi:10.7202/1067403ar

De la disparition scénique entre le postmoderne et le posthumain

2019· article· fr· W2953221942 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Filip Dukanić

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArtSpectaclePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose une réflexion critique sur les concepts de postmodernisme et de posthumanisme dans le cadre du spectacle vivant contemporain. Dans un premier temps, en nous référant aux travaux de Jean-François Lyotard, Fredric Jameson et Cary Wolfe, nous allons mettre en évidence, selon une perspective historique, la genèse de ces concepts et analyser la façon dont ils repensent les rapports entre les nouvelles technologies et l’humain. Dans un deuxième temps, nous allons analyser le spectacle Le Sacre du Printemps (Paris, 2015) de Romeo Castellucci pour vérifier l’hypothèse du présent travail d’analyse qui suppose que cette création scénique se découvre sur le plan esthétique comme une mise en pratique des théories articulant la dualité postmodernisme/posthumanisme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207