MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perencanaan Sistem Long Term Evolution di Wilayah Kota Denpasar Memanfaatkan Bale Banjar untuk Menempatkan Base Station

2018· article· id· W2953224801 on OpenAlexaff
Yoel Sthefianus, Pande Ketut Sudiarta, Gede Sukadarmika

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal SPEKTRUM · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Military Integration
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)WiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGeographyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perencanaan sistem jaringan LTE dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, salah satunya adalah faktor kontur wilayah yang berbeda. Kontur permukaan wilayah berpengaruh terhadap cakupan area yang dihasilkan suatu base station. Perencanaan jaringan berdasarkan analisis perhitungan, tidak mempertimbangkan kontur wilayah, maka untuk menunjang hal tersebut diperlukan simulasi menggunakan software Atoll. Metode pada penelitian ini menggunakan perhitungan dan simulasi software Atoll. Penempatan base station memanfaatkan 385 Bale Banjar sebagai titik site menara rooftop. Penempatan ini dilakukan di Bale Banjar dikarenakan mudahnya akses perijinan tempat, seperti base station pada Bale Banjar Balun. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan dan pemodelan simulasi jarak jangkauan antena base station dengan model propagasi Cost-231 Hatta frekuensi 1800 MHz, diperoleh jarak sebesar 1,186 km. Simulasi perencanaan sistem LTE di wilayah kota Denpasar memerlukan 55 site, terdiri dari 54 site yang memanfaatkan Bale Banjar untuk menempatkan base station dan 1 site di luar kawasan Bale Banjar, serta diperlukan pengaturan electrical tilt sebanyak 40 site untuk mengatasi permasalahan cakupan area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal SPEKTRUMSame topicEducation and Military IntegrationFrench-language works237,207