MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953230888 · doi:10.1021/ic302292w

Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Electronic Properties of the Tetragonal (RE<sup>I</sup>RE<sup>II</sup>)<sub>3</sub>SbO<sub>3</sub> Phases (RE<sup>I</sup> = La, Ce; RE<sup>II</sup> = Dy, Ho)

2013· article· en· W2953230888 on OpenAlexafffund
Scott Forbes, Pengli Wang, Jinlei Yao, Taras Kolodiazhnyi, Yurij Mozharivskyj

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTetragonal crystal systemChemistryElectrical resistivity and conductivityMonoclinic crystal systemCrystal structureCrystallographyCeriumElectronic structureThermoelectric effectMicroprobeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MineralogyInorganic chemistryComputational chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our efforts to tune the charge transport properties of the recently discovered RE(3)SbO(3) phases (RE is a rare earth), we have prepared mixed (RE(I)RE(II))(3)SbO(3) phases (RE(I) = La, Ce; RE(II) = Dy, Ho) via high-temperature reactions at 1550 °C or greater. In contrast to monoclinic RE(3)SbO(3), the new phases adopt the P4(2)/mnm symmetry but have a structural framework similar to that of RE(3)SbO(3). The formation of the tetragonal (RE(I)RE(II))(3)SbO(3) phases is driven by the ordering of the large and small RE atoms on different atomic sites. The La(1.5)Dy(1.5)SbO(3), La(1.5)Ho(1.5)SbO(3), and Ce(1.5)Ho(1.5)SbO(3) samples were subjected to elemental microprobe analysis to verify their compositions and to electrical resistivity measurements to evaluate their thermoelectric potential. The electrical resistivity data indicate the presence of a band gap, which is supported by electronic structure calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207