MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953327502 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v18i2.834

Did Canada Survive the Financial Crisis Better than the United States

2016· article· en· W2953327502 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ashrafee T Hossain, Dao Xuan Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueTHE JOURNAL OF APPLIED BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Financial crisisBusinessFinancial systemMonetary economicsEconomicsFinanceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper compares and contrasts the influence of leverage on firm performance between the United States and Canada. By analyzing 10 largest oil & gas companies each from Canada and the US, we find that leverage has a negative impact on firm performance for both these countries. Moreover, we find strong evidence that the performance gap between high and low leverage firms is lower in Canada, and the results are prominent during the financial crisis of the last decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTHE JOURNAL OF APPLIED BUSINESS AND ECONOMICSSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207