Scalp Dermatitis in Patients Sensitized to Components of Hair Products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis is an inflammatory condition that less commonly presents with scalp involvement. Recently, T regulatory cells have been documented to be residents of hair follicles, illuminating why contact allergens are less likely to elicit dermatitis in the scalp. OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to determine the prevalence of scalp symptoms, with and without other affected areas, in patients presenting for evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis and to determine the allergens most likely to be associated with scalp dermatitis. METHODS: We examined allergens commonly found in hair products and stratified positive patch test results by the following affected areas: face, eyelid, neck, or hands, where exposure by runoff is common, versus scalp. CONCLUSIONS: Para-phenylenediamine (PPD) is the most common allergen in patients with scalp dermatitis. The rate of PPD sensitization is higher in nonwhite compared with white patients. In the small number of patients with isolated scalp involvement, positive patch tests to PPD were documented in a minority. Other allergens found in hair products may present without scalp symptoms. Patients with dermatitis affecting areas other than the scalp should provide their hair product ingredients to guide patch test selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".