Catalytic Oxidative Dehydrogenation of <i>n</i>‐Butane on Gallium Nitride‐Containing Titanosilicate Catalyst
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GaN‐containing titanosilicate catalysts were used for the first time for the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of n ‐butane at a relatively low reaction temperature (460 °C). Commercially available GaN powder with a wurtzite crystal structure showed superior reactivity and stability for the ODH of n ‐butane. The catalytic property of GaN catalyst for ODH strongly depends on the GaN particle size. The effects of the GaN weight percentage and GaN particle size on the catalytic performance are investigated in a fixed bed reactor. Based on the physicochemical properties of the catalyst characterized via TEM, DLS, N 2 adsorption‐desorption, XRF, O 2 ‐TPD, XRD, XPS, and in‐situ FTIR, the textural and structural properties of catalyst were obtained. The catalytic results reveal that the presence of GaN increases the activity of the catalysts, indicating that GaN can be used as a new active phase for the ODH of n ‐butane. XRD, XPS, O 2 ‐TPD, DLS, TEM, and in‐situ FTIR results show that activated O species exist on the surface of the GaN catalyst and enhance the catalytic performance with a decreasing GaN particle size, suggesting that smaller GaN particles possess a remarkable capability to activate O species in O 2 and C‐H bonds in light alkanes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it