Encadrement juridique du congé hospitalier en contexte de délégation de soins aux proches aidants: portrait de la responsabilité civile des acteurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le réseau de la santé publique du Québec mise sur la prestation des soins à domicile pour s’adapter aux pressions financières découlant des changements sociodémographiques. Les proches aidants se retrouvent donc de plus en plus sollicités pour contribuer au maintien d’un domicile sécuritaire. Toutefois, les médecins et les établissements ont des obligations légales à l’égard du patient et des proches aidants. Ces derniers constituent un groupe vulnérable et les établissements de santé adoptent parfois des politiques internes qui vont à l’encontre du bien-être des proches aidants. Cet article vise à clarifier l’encadrement juridique s’appliquant aux proches aidants lors de la détermination du congé médical et hospitalier des patients. Une étude juridique a été effectuée, ciblant la jurisprudence et la doctrine québécoise en matière de responsabilité civile médicale et hospitalière. Les résultats de cette étude dressent un portrait exhaustif de la responsabilité civile du médecin, de l’établissement, ainsi que du proche aidant, dans le contexte du congé médical et hospitalier.AbstractQuebec’s public health network focuses on the provision of home care to cope with the financial pressures arising from sociodemographic changes. Caregivers find themselves more and more solicited to help maintain a safe home. However, physicians and facilities have legal obligations to the patient and caregivers. The latter are a vulnerable group and health institutions sometimes adopt internal policies that go against the well-being of caregivers. This article aims to clarify the legal framework applicable to caregivers when determining the medical and hospital discharge of patients. A legal study was carried out, targeting case law and the Quebec doctrine on medical and hospital liability. The results of this study provide a comprehensive portrait of the liability of the physician, the facility, and the caregiver in the context of medical and hospital leave.Key words: Caregivers; medical and hospital leave; medical liability/obligations of health professionals; hospital liability/obligations of institutions/devolution of care
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".