MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Preliminary results of earlier steroid use with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL).

2019· article· en· W2953537665 on OpenAlexaff
Max S. Topp, Tom van Meerten, Martin Wermke, Elly Lugtenburg, Monique C. Minnema, Kevin Song, Catherine Thiéblemont, Yizhou Jiang, Vicki Plaks, A. Kerber, Marie José Kersten

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCytokine release syndromeAdverse effectTocilizumabInternal medicineCohortClinical endpointTransplantationSurgeryGastroenterologyOncologyChimeric antigen receptorCancerDiseaseRandomized controlled trialImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7558 Background: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved in the EU and US for patients (pts) with R/R LBCL with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. In the 2-y follow-up of ZUMA-1, the objective response rate (ORR) was 83% with a complete response (CR) rate of 58%. Grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NE) occurred in 11% and 32% of pts, respectively; 26% of pts received steroids, and 43% received tocilizumab (Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). A safety expansion cohort was added to evaluate the effect of earlier steroid use on the rates of these adverse events (AEs). Methods: Eligible pts with R/R LBCL were leukapheresed and received conditioning chemotherapy followed by a target dose of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg. Pts in this cohort received early steroid intervention starting at Grade 1 NE and at Grade 1 CRS when no improvement was observed after 3 days of supportive care. The primary endpoint for this cohort was incidence and severity of CRS and NE. Results: As of 9/14/2018, 21 of 40 planned pts received axi-cel with a minimum follow-up of 1 mo (median, 2.6 mo). The median age was 63 y (range, 36 – 73), 67% were male, 81% had disease stage III-IV, 76% were R/R to ≥ second-line therapy, and 10% had relapsed post-autologous stem cell transplantation. Seventy-six percent of pts received steroids and 81% received tocilizumab. Most pts (81%) had Grade ≥ 3 AEs, most commonly neutrophil count decreased (33%), anemia (29%), and pyrexia (24%). Grade ≥ 3 NE occurred in 10% of pts; the most common symptoms were somnolence (10%) and confusional state (10%). Grade 1 and 2 NE occurred in 38% and 5% of pts, respectively. No pt had Grade ≥ 3 CRS; 33% of pts had Grade 1 CRS and 67% had Grade 2. There were no deaths due to AEs; 1 pt died due to disease progression. The ORR per investigator assessment was 76% with 48% of pts achieving a CR. Pharmacokinetic data will be presented. Conclusions: Early use of steroids may help in managing severe CRS and NE by potentially reducing their incidence in pts treated with CAR T cell therapy without affecting response rates. Optimizing AE management may help to further improve the benefit:risk profile of CAR T cell therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02348216.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→