MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953582289 · doi:10.9734/jenrr/2019/v3i130089

Determination of Energy and Exergy of Syngas Produced from Air-steam Gasification of Wheat Straw in a Dual Distributer Fluidized Bed Gasifier

2019· article· en· W2953582289 on OpenAlexaff
Yaning Zhang, A. E. Ghaly, Sammy Sadaka, Bingxi Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Research and Reviews · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyngasExergyWood gas generatorFluidizationStrawFluidized bedPulp and paper industryBiomass (ecology)Waste managementEnvironmental scienceChemistryCoalHydrogenAgronomyEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy and exergy of syngas produced from air-steam gasification of wheat straw in a dual-distributor fluidized bed gasifier under different operating conditions were evaluated. Three fluidization velocities (0.35, 0.40 and 0.45 m/s), 3 steam flow rates (0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 kg/min) and 3 biomass: steam ratios (3.00, 4.00 and 5.00 kg/kg) were investigated. The energy values of CO, H2, N2, CO2, CH4, C2H4 and C2H6 varied within the ranges of 1627.09-4646.60, 1543.30-2896.11, 274.75-1742.86, 82.03-574.24, 3225.39-4931.40, 1493.35-3777.44 and 892.74-2319.72 kJ/kg fuel, respectively. The overall energy distribution was (CH4 & CO & C2H4 & H2)>C2H6>(N2 & CO2). The results showed that when the fluidization velocity (FV) was increased from 0.35 m/s to 0.45 m/s (28.57%), the total energy of syngas increased by 1.16-28.59% depending on the steam flow rate (SFR} and biomass: steam ratio (B:S) used. Increasing the SFR from 0.20 kg/min to 0.30 kg/min (50.00%) decreased the total energy of syngas by 27.23-62.35% depending on the FV and B:S used. Increasing the B:S from 3.00 kg/kg to 5.00 kg/kg (66.67%) decreased the total energy of syngas by 11.86-37.33% depending on the FV and SFR used. The exergy values of CO, H2, N2, CO2, CH4, C2H4 and C2H6 were in the ranges of 1486.70-4224.40, 1183.82-2209.00, 60.26-677.26, 54.02-452.97, 2913.74-4448.38, 1404.76-3541.76 and 833.00-2156.42 kJ/kg fuel, respectively. The overall exergy distribution was (CH4 & CO)>(C2H4 & H2 & C2H6)>(N2 &CO2). When the FV was increased from 0.35 to 0.45 m/s(28.57%), the total exergy of syngas increased by 1.45-26.93% depending on the SFR and B:S used. Increasing the SFR from 0.20 kg/min to 0.30 kg/min (50.00%) decreased the total exergy of syngas by 26.78-63.26% depending on the FV and B:S used. Increasing the B:S from 3.00 kg/kg to 5.00 kg/kg (66.67%) decreased the total exergy of syngas by 10.32-36.07% depending on the FV and SFR used. The effect of SFR on the total energy and total exergy of syngas was the highest, followed by B:S and FV. The highest energy (20004.54 kJ/kg fuel) and exergy (16886.06 kJ/kg fuel) of syngas were obtained at the FV of 0.45 m/s, the SFR of 0.20 kg/min and the B:S of 3.00 kg/kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy Research and ReviewsSame topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207