MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W295361123

"What's up, Doc?".

2009· article· en· W295361123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The owner of several pet rabbits presented 2 of them (1 alive and 1 dead) to a veterinary practitioner in the hope of receiving a diagnosis for the problems the rabbits were experiencing and, possibly, a treatment for the remaining rabbits. The owner reported that several of the rabbits in the group had developed a swollen abdomen and passed a mucoid substance from the anus prior to dying. The dead rabbit, a 7-week-old female, was forwarded to the Livestock Disease Diagnostic Center of the University of Kentucky for postmortem examination. The rabbit was moderately dehydrated but, otherwise, in fair to good body condition. The abdomen was distended and the stomach contained moderate amounts of water and mucus. Portions of the small intestine and colon appeared pale, thin-walled, and translucent due to being filled and dilated with a clear, mucoid substance (Figure 1). The cecum was firm and impacted with ingesta. Figure 1 The abdominal contents of a 7-week-old, female, pet rabbit with mucoid enteropathy. Portions of the small intestine and colon appeared pale, thin-walled, and translucent because they were filled and dilated with clear mucus. A sample of the contents of ... Histopathologic examination of the small intestine confirmed the presence of large amounts of mucinous material admixed with very large numbers of bacteria, plant material, sloughed enterocytes, and massive numbers of coccidian parasites in various stages of their life cycle. Coccidian parasites were also present within the lamina propria (Figures 2A and 2B). There was little evidence of inflammation. Various forms of coccidian parasites were also present within hyperplastic and dilated bile ducts of the liver. Figures 2A and 2B Histologic sections of the small intestine from the rabbit in Figure 1. There are massive numbers of oocysts of Eimeria species within the lumen (A) and mucosa (B). Hematoxylin and eosin. Bar = 100 μm for both. Examination of feces from the rabbit revealed oocysts (too numerous to count) of various Eimeria species. There are at least 12 Eimeria species that affect rabbits with at least 11 species that infect cells of the intestine with varying degrees of pathogenicity (1,2). Aerobic and anaerobic culture of the contents of the intestine yielded nonpathogenic bacteria and other saprophytic microorganisms. Based on these findings, the rabbit was diagnosed as having intestinal coccidiosis involving mixed Eimeria sp., hepatic coccidiosis caused by Eimeria stiedae, and mucoid enteropathy. Mucoid enteropathy is a widely recognized and well described problem of domestic and captive rabbits (1,2). The term “mucoid enteropathy” is a nonspecific, descriptive term that refers to what are likely different, but related, enteric diseases in which there is marked secretion of mucus in the intestines with minimal or no evidence of inflammation. Mucoid enteropathy is also known as mucoid enteritis; however, the term “mucoid enteritis” is also used by rabbit fanciers and others to refer to any condition in which rabbits produce mucoid diarrhea or feces with an increased coat of mucus. In these situations, there is usually evidence of injury and inflammation of the intestine caused by pathogenic microorganisms (1,2). Rabbits affected with mucoid enteropathy are typically between 7 and 10 weeks of age, but adults can be affected. While various studies have produced several theories about the cause of the disease, the etiology and pathogenesis remain poorly understood. A common suggestion is that rabbits fed a diet low in indigestible fiber are predisposed to the disease. The rate of morbidity due to mucoid enteropathy in a group of rabbits is variable, but may be high. The case fatality rate is often high, reportedly 60% to 100%, regardless of the treatment employed (1,2). The postmortem findings in rabbits with mucoid enteropathy typically include the distention of portions of the small intestine and colon with translucent fluid, mucus, or both, and impaction of the cecum with dry ingesta, as was seen in the rabbit discussed herein. Histologically, as illustrated in this case (Figures 3 and ​and4)4) there is goblet cell hyperplasia in the mucosa of the small and large intestine with release of extremely large amounts of mucin into the intestinal lumen. As noted above, there is little, if any, associated inflammation (2). Figure 3 Histologic section of the small intestine of the rabbit in Figure 1. Alcian blue stains the glycoproteins in mucin blue. Note the large number of mucin containing globlet cells in the mucosa and the mucin being secreted into the intestinal lumen. There ... Figure 4 Histologic section of the colon from the rabbit in Figure 1. The colon is filled with mucus that contains blue staining glycoproteins. Alcian blue. Bar = 1 mm. Goblet cells are well-differentiated cells present within the intestinal epithelium (and other mucus membranes). Goblet cells produce and secrete mucins, a family of high molecular weight glycoproteins. Once secreted, mucins hydrate and gel to form mucus. Mucus lubricates the intestines and also serves as a barrier to protect the intestinal mucosa against harmful chemicals, microorganisms, and microbial products, including toxins. Secretion of stored mucin and goblet cell hyperplasia occur in response to a variety of stimuli that include chemical and physical irritation, and inflammation (3–5). Because the cause and pathogenesis of mucoid enteropathy is uncertain, recommendations for treatment of affected animals and for the prevention of further disease are empirical. These recommendations include the correction of any problem that may lead to the disruption of intestinal function, such as: stasis and impaction of the cecum, or imbalance of intestinal microflora referred to by some as dysbacteriosis or dysbiosis (5). Disruption of intestinal function in rabbits has been associated with stress, that may occur from weaning, transportation, changes in the environment, and perceived threats (1). While kits are sometimes weaned as early as 25 days of age (1), it appears to be more common to wean pet rabbits between 5 and 7 weeks of age. Dysbiosis in rabbits is thought to result from a variety of factors and includes the administration of antimicrobial drugs and a change in the diet, particularly a change to a diet high in energy, low in fiber, or both. The high incidence of mucoid enteropathy in 7- to 10-week-old rabbits may be related to recent weaning, a change in diet, or both. In this case, the referring veterinarian and owner were advised to ensure that the rabbits’ diet contained appropriate amounts of fiber and that they had free access to water. It was also suggested that the rabbits be treated for coccidiosis and that measures be implemented to prevent or minimize future infections. In summary, the history, clinical findings, and distinctive postmortem findings associated with mucoid enteropathy in rabbits should allow for the diagnosis in most instances. To address the problem, a review of the management practices should be conducted and appropriate changes instituted. The review should include diet composition and any recent changes in feeding practices, as well as any other event that might have contributed to the disruption of the intestinal microflora, such as: administration of antimicrobials or concurrent disease. Ancillary tests, such as fecal floatation, histopathology, and bacterial culture, can also be performed to investigate the potential role of pathogens (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it