MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W295361123

"What's up, Doc?".

2009· article· en· W295361123 sur OpenAlexaff
Andrew L. Allen, Uneeda K. Bryant

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Saskatchewan
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyEnvironmental science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The owner of several pet rabbits presented 2 of them (1 alive and 1 dead) to a veterinary practitioner in the hope of receiving a diagnosis for the problems the rabbits were experiencing and, possibly, a treatment for the remaining rabbits. The owner reported that several of the rabbits in the group had developed a swollen abdomen and passed a mucoid substance from the anus prior to dying. The dead rabbit, a 7-week-old female, was forwarded to the Livestock Disease Diagnostic Center of the University of Kentucky for postmortem examination. The rabbit was moderately dehydrated but, otherwise, in fair to good body condition. The abdomen was distended and the stomach contained moderate amounts of water and mucus. Portions of the small intestine and colon appeared pale, thin-walled, and translucent due to being filled and dilated with a clear, mucoid substance (Figure 1). The cecum was firm and impacted with ingesta. Figure 1 The abdominal contents of a 7-week-old, female, pet rabbit with mucoid enteropathy. Portions of the small intestine and colon appeared pale, thin-walled, and translucent because they were filled and dilated with clear mucus. A sample of the contents of ... Histopathologic examination of the small intestine confirmed the presence of large amounts of mucinous material admixed with very large numbers of bacteria, plant material, sloughed enterocytes, and massive numbers of coccidian parasites in various stages of their life cycle. Coccidian parasites were also present within the lamina propria (Figures 2A and 2B). There was little evidence of inflammation. Various forms of coccidian parasites were also present within hyperplastic and dilated bile ducts of the liver. Figures 2A and 2B Histologic sections of the small intestine from the rabbit in Figure 1. There are massive numbers of oocysts of Eimeria species within the lumen (A) and mucosa (B). Hematoxylin and eosin. Bar = 100 μm for both. Examination of feces from the rabbit revealed oocysts (too numerous to count) of various Eimeria species. There are at least 12 Eimeria species that affect rabbits with at least 11 species that infect cells of the intestine with varying degrees of pathogenicity (1,2). Aerobic and anaerobic culture of the contents of the intestine yielded nonpathogenic bacteria and other saprophytic microorganisms. Based on these findings, the rabbit was diagnosed as having intestinal coccidiosis involving mixed Eimeria sp., hepatic coccidiosis caused by Eimeria stiedae, and mucoid enteropathy. Mucoid enteropathy is a widely recognized and well described problem of domestic and captive rabbits (1,2). The term “mucoid enteropathy” is a nonspecific, descriptive term that refers to what are likely different, but related, enteric diseases in which there is marked secretion of mucus in the intestines with minimal or no evidence of inflammation. Mucoid enteropathy is also known as mucoid enteritis; however, the term “mucoid enteritis” is also used by rabbit fanciers and others to refer to any condition in which rabbits produce mucoid diarrhea or feces with an increased coat of mucus. In these situations, there is usually evidence of injury and inflammation of the intestine caused by pathogenic microorganisms (1,2). Rabbits affected with mucoid enteropathy are typically between 7 and 10 weeks of age, but adults can be affected. While various studies have produced several theories about the cause of the disease, the etiology and pathogenesis remain poorly understood. A common suggestion is that rabbits fed a diet low in indigestible fiber are predisposed to the disease. The rate of morbidity due to mucoid enteropathy in a group of rabbits is variable, but may be high. The case fatality rate is often high, reportedly 60% to 100%, regardless of the treatment employed (1,2). The postmortem findings in rabbits with mucoid enteropathy typically include the distention of portions of the small intestine and colon with translucent fluid, mucus, or both, and impaction of the cecum with dry ingesta, as was seen in the rabbit discussed herein. Histologically, as illustrated in this case (Figures 3 and ​and4)4) there is goblet cell hyperplasia in the mucosa of the small and large intestine with release of extremely large amounts of mucin into the intestinal lumen. As noted above, there is little, if any, associated inflammation (2). Figure 3 Histologic section of the small intestine of the rabbit in Figure 1. Alcian blue stains the glycoproteins in mucin blue. Note the large number of mucin containing globlet cells in the mucosa and the mucin being secreted into the intestinal lumen. There ... Figure 4 Histologic section of the colon from the rabbit in Figure 1. The colon is filled with mucus that contains blue staining glycoproteins. Alcian blue. Bar = 1 mm. Goblet cells are well-differentiated cells present within the intestinal epithelium (and other mucus membranes). Goblet cells produce and secrete mucins, a family of high molecular weight glycoproteins. Once secreted, mucins hydrate and gel to form mucus. Mucus lubricates the intestines and also serves as a barrier to protect the intestinal mucosa against harmful chemicals, microorganisms, and microbial products, including toxins. Secretion of stored mucin and goblet cell hyperplasia occur in response to a variety of stimuli that include chemical and physical irritation, and inflammation (3–5). Because the cause and pathogenesis of mucoid enteropathy is uncertain, recommendations for treatment of affected animals and for the prevention of further disease are empirical. These recommendations include the correction of any problem that may lead to the disruption of intestinal function, such as: stasis and impaction of the cecum, or imbalance of intestinal microflora referred to by some as dysbacteriosis or dysbiosis (5). Disruption of intestinal function in rabbits has been associated with stress, that may occur from weaning, transportation, changes in the environment, and perceived threats (1). While kits are sometimes weaned as early as 25 days of age (1), it appears to be more common to wean pet rabbits between 5 and 7 weeks of age. Dysbiosis in rabbits is thought to result from a variety of factors and includes the administration of antimicrobial drugs and a change in the diet, particularly a change to a diet high in energy, low in fiber, or both. The high incidence of mucoid enteropathy in 7- to 10-week-old rabbits may be related to recent weaning, a change in diet, or both. In this case, the referring veterinarian and owner were advised to ensure that the rabbits’ diet contained appropriate amounts of fiber and that they had free access to water. It was also suggested that the rabbits be treated for coccidiosis and that measures be implemented to prevent or minimize future infections. In summary, the history, clinical findings, and distinctive postmortem findings associated with mucoid enteropathy in rabbits should allow for the diagnosis in most instances. To address the problem, a review of the management practices should be conducted and appropriate changes instituted. The review should include diet composition and any recent changes in feeding practices, as well as any other event that might have contributed to the disruption of the intestinal microflora, such as: administration of antimicrobials or concurrent disease. Ancillary tests, such as fecal floatation, histopathology, and bacterial culture, can also be performed to investigate the potential role of pathogens (2).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,979
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,140

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, HealthTravaux en français237 207