MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953627802 · doi:10.20371/inaf/pub/2018_00007

Installation, configuration, deployment and run guide for the Access Control module. Administrator's guide 1.0

2018· article· en· W2953627802 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara Bertocco, Giuliano Taffoni

Bibliographic record

VenueIstituto Nazionale di Astrofisica · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLightweight Directory Access ProtocolComputer scienceAuthentication (law)Directory serviceOperating systemWorld Wide WebSoftware deploymentAccess controlService (business)DatabaseDirectoryComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Access Control is a client and server authentication and authorization implementation for user and group management. It has LDAP as default persistence layer built-in and it provides a RESTful interface to authentication, authorization and user and group management. This technical report provides an administrators guide to install, configure and manage the service known as Group Management Service, based on software APIs open source released by CADC (Canadian Astronomy Data Center). The guide includes instructions on how to install and configure the ldap server 389-Directory Server and the Web Server Tomcat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaSame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207