Revisiting Trade-offs between Rubisco Kinetic Parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rubisco is the primary carboxylase of the Calvin cycle, the most abundant enzyme in the biosphere, and one of the best-characterized enzymes. On the basis of correlations between Rubisco kinetic parameters, it is widely posited that constraints embedded in the catalytic mechanism enforce trade-offs between CO2 specificity, SC/O, and maximum carboxylation rate, kcat,C. However, the reasoning that established this view was based on data from ?20 organisms. Here, we re-examine models of trade-offs in Rubisco catalysis using a data set from ?300 organisms. Correlations between kinetic parameters are substantially attenuated in this larger data set, with the inverse relationship between kcat,C and SC/O being a key example. Nonetheless, measured kinetic parameters display extremely limited variation, consistent with a view of Rubisco as a highly constrained enzyme. More than 95% of kcat,C values are between 1 and 10 s?1, and no measured kcat,C exceeds 15 s?1. Similarly, SC/O varies by only 30% among Form I Rubiscos and <10% among C3 plant enzymes. Limited variation in SC/O forces a strong positive correlation between the catalytic efficiencies (kcat/KM) for carboxylation and oxygenation, consistent with a model of Rubisco catalysis in which increasing the rate of addition of CO2 to the enzyme?substrate complex requires an equal increase in the O2 addition rate. Altogether, these data suggest that Rubisco evolution is tightly constrained by the physicochemical limits of CO2/O2 discrimination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".