The Watchdog of Nationalism: The Romanian Press in Interwar Transylvania and its Role in the Creation of National Identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on the role of the interwar Romanian press in Transylvania in the creation of national identity following the union of the aforementioned province with the Kingdom of Romania in 1918. It argues that the Romanian press contributed significantly in constructing, circulating and reproducing a national identity buttressed by the discourse of integral nationalism during the first decade of the interwar period. Based on Romanian newspaper articles covering various nation-building policies and practices, this thesis examines the attempted nationalization of Transylvania's multi-ethnic, multi-confessional character through the politics of cultural engineering. This paper also argues that the Transylvanian Romanian elite, rather than being passive receptors of Bucharest's nationalizing projects, actively contributed to the Romanization of the their regions. Often, their nationalist views were far more radical and extremist than their Bucharest peers, making their province an ideal place for the emergence of an extreme-right student movement in the early 1920s. Espoused and encouraged by the interwar Romanian press, the development of the radical nationalist discourse, can thus be linked to the rise and widespread support of Romanian fascism as an doctrine and a movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".