MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953691231 · doi:10.82308/39098

Competing visions, common forms: the construction of mosque architecture in Canada and the US

2014· article· en· W2953691231 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Nadia Kurd

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsArchitectureIslamIslamic architectureVisionPoliticsBuilt environmentAestheticsSociologyHistoryLawVisual artsEngineeringPolitical scienceArtCivil engineeringArchaeologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From minarets to geometric patterned tiles, the reach and influence of Islamic architectural forms extends far beyond the geographic limits of the Muslim world. Indeed, as early as the eighteenth- and nineteenth- century the architecture and visual cultures of Islam has travelled to North American shores and has affected its built environment. This dissertation examines the making of both the Moorish Revival and mosque architecture in Canada and the US. I argue that these two types of buildings, which have been created by Muslims and non-Muslims alike, show the variability and polarizing nature of contemporary Islamic architecture. For Muslim communities, the primary expression of Islamic architectural ideals is manifested in the building of mosques. In this study, I examine how these contemporary mosques straddle notions of traditional visual and architectural forms with the realities of urban, non-Islamic environments. Through the examinations of mosques that have either been renovated from existing structures and ones that have been purpose-built, I investigate the ways in which these buildings have been responsive to and shaped by the existing architectural norms, political and social circumstances in Canada and the US from the early twentieth century onward. In studying these two contrasting examples of mosques, I argue that a commonality between these structures exists: they both mark a break from the traditional practice of Islamic architecture and reveal a uniquely diasporic Muslim tension with the question of authenticity and difference. These contemporary mosques not only show what is at stake in the use of Islamic architectural tropes but also provide a glimpse of the varied application and amalgamation of built forms by Muslim communities living in Canada and the US. Within Western Muslim communities, debates on the nature of inclusion and agency of women in mosques have also increased in the last decade. The performance of women-led prayers and sermons, most notably led by Amina Wadud, has challenged the segregation of men and women commonly practiced in mosques. Outside the Muslim community, groups such as the Shriners and Masons to wealthy individuals such as aviator-cum-entrepreneur Glenn H. Curtiss and Hudson-school painter Frederic Edwin Church have also made use of the architectural forms associated with Muslim cultures. I look at how built-forms such as the minaret, bi-coloured brickwork and use of hand-painted tiles have been incorporated in their homes and masonic lodges. Although Moorish Revival buildings utilize a visual language similar to those of mosques, they envisioned an Islam wholly through the lens of Orientalism and removed from the racialized realities of North American Muslim populations. Drawing on the work by Edward Said, I examine the lingering legacy of the Moorish Revival and that, when compared to Islamic mosques, and their diverse congregants show the distinct fundamental difference between the two.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0240.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207