Mujeres textimoniantes americanas de la conquista europea en Semillas de los Dioses Perú legendario (2000) de Lucía Fox y La isla bajo el mar (2009) de Isabel Allende
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the basis of the evidence that several Latin American writers are inspired from historical facts like the European colonization of the American continent that are vital in the sociohistorical evolution of peoples, I am interested in exploring in this research how female characters are depicted. My hypothesis is that there is in contemporary novelists — Peruavian-American Lucía Fox and Chilean- American Isabel Allende— a clear and feminist awareness of the interrelationship between fiction and the historical and historiographic record in the literary history of Latin America My goal is to put the record straight about the official stories where women’s involvement has been purged clean f their pages; and in so doing women will be able to shape new and dynamic representations of women in colonial times of various peoples and countries of the Central American, Caribbean and South American regions. My interest focuses on a critical analysis of two characters created in novels that bear witness to and rise up against the coercive systems imposed by Spanish and French colonialism by means of women’s domesticity and Africans’ slavery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".