MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

L’usage de la chronique Quam To Muang lors des funérailles chez les Taï-noirs, Viêt Nam

2010· book-chapter· fr· W2953906658 on OpenAlex
Masao Kashinaga

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le peuple taï-noir (tai dam) est un peuple qui appartient aux groupes de langue taï résidant dans le grand bassin de Diên Biên, au nord-ouest du Viêt Nam, non loin de la frontière laotienne. Le bassin Diên Biên a été le site de la bataille de Diên Biên Phu, qui mit fin à la guerre d’Indochine en 1954. Aujourd’hui, l’une des principales attractions de Diên Biên Phu est le fort de l’armée française, bâti sur la « Colline A1 » (Fig. 1). Pour leur part, les Taï-noirs appellent cette colline Lang ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0190.061
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it