MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953907977 · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1301

Evaluating patients' unmet needs in hidradenitis suppurativa: Results from the Global Survey Of Impact and Healthcare Needs (VOICE) Project

2019· article· en· W2953907977 on OpenAlexaff
Amit Garg, Erica Neuren, Denny Cha, Joslyn S. Kirby, John R Ingram, Gregor B. E. Jemec, Solveig Esmann, Linnea Thorlacius, Bente Villumsen, V. del Mármol, Aude Nassif, M. Delage, Dagfinn Moseng, Øystein Grimstad, Haley B. Naik, Robert G. Micheletti, Sandra Guilbault, Angie Parks Miller, Iltefat Hamzavi, Hessel H. van der Zee, Errol P. Prens, Naomi Kappe, Christine B. Ardon, Brian Kirby, Rosalind Hughes, Christos C. Zouboulis, Georgios Nikolakis, Falk G. Bechara, Łukasz Matusiak, Jacek C. Szepietowski, Amelia Głowaczewska, Saxon D. Smith, Noah Goldfarb, Steven Daveluy, Christina Avgoustou, Evangelos J. Giamarellos‐Bourboulis, Steven A. Cohen, Yssra Soliman, Elena Gonzalez Brant, Oleg E. Akilov, Christopher J. Sayed, Jerry Tan, Afsáneh Alavi, Michelle A. Lowes, J.C. Pascual, Hassan Riad, Shani Fisher, Arnon D. Cohen, So Yeon Paek, Barry I. Resnik, Qiang Ju, Lanqi Wang, Andrew Strunk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity of WindsorWestern University
FundersCilagJanssen BiotechInflaRxMarie CurieAbbVieSanofiUCBAstraZenecaRegeneron PharmaceuticalsNovartisNational Psoriasis Foundation
KeywordsHidradenitis suppurativaMedicineHealth careSurvey researchMEDLINEFamily medicinePathologyDiseaseApplied psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations279
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of DermatologySame topicHidradenitis Suppurativa and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207