Japanese Macbeth : Shakespeare's role on the international stage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'étude des pièces de théâtres Shakespeariennes se limite généralement aux performances et aux adaptations effectuées en Amérique et en Europe. Cet ouvrage se concentre sur le théâtre de Shakespeare en Asie, plus particulièrement, celui au Japon. La pièce étudiée dans cet ouvrage s'intitule « Noh Macbeth » et est une adaptation de Macbeth sur la scène japonaise nô. Le but de ce travail est de comparer le théâtre élisabéthain avec celui du nô, et d'établir par la suite si ces deux styles ont des ressemblances au niveau de l’adaptation Shakespearienne. Pour se faire, je propose d’évaluer le rôle de Shakespeare sur la scène internationale. Aussi, il est important d’étudier l’historique de Macbeth, à partir de sa création et à travers le temps, en passant par l’homme historique qui se trouve à la base du récit. Finalement, en regardant la place du théâtre nô au sein de la culture japonaise ainsi que l’adaptation de Macbeth dans ce théâtre, il sera possible de voir que, puisque le théâtre élisabéthain a disparu, le style théâtral nô se prête bien aux œuvres Shakespeariennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".