Bibliographic record
Abstract
La division primitive du travail à la source de nombreuses formes de domination et d’exploitation fut dès le départ une division sexuelle du travail, créant des relations asymétriques et hiérarchiques, où les femmes occupent le bas de l’échelle. Ce contexte socio-culturel ne peut qu’influencer les théories sexuelles spontanées résultant de l’activité traductive/refoulante de la psyché de l’enfant confrontée aux messages énigmatiques de l’autre. L’assignation de genre est un de ces messages majeurs. Les enfants tenteront de le traduire en s’aidant de leur expérience corporelle et des outils symboliques transmis par leur entourage. Ainsi, les théories sexuelles infantiles reflèteront dans une large mesure les stéréotypes dominants, ceux-ci étant à leur tour maintenus et renforcés par la pression que les théories et fantasmes infantiles exercent inconsciemment sur la perception et l’opinion. L’erreur de Freud fut d’intégrer telles quelles les théories infantiles dans la doctrine psychanalytique. La question est de savoir comment cela a pu se produire. À la suite de Laplanche, nous examinons en quoi l’abandon de la théorie de la séduction peut expliquer cet état de fait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".